Jun 14
The reports/bugs points (Tester Ranking) and amount distribution should depend on the test cycle description/instructions and on live/old tests.
I observed that live test cycles (without old submitted bugs and known bugs) are easy to test and the testers can easily test the sites and submit the bugs quickly because they have no complicated instructions and descriptions. I also observed that some specific testers will show in the live sites' tests and they submitted the reports quickly because it's very easy to find out the bugs and they can get the points easily and obviously the ranking will be updated.
- You can also check that these specific testers will not show in the old tests where the tests instructions are complicated and difficult to find out the bugs because these tests have already many known bugs. one reason they did not accept the old tests.
- The tester who accepted the old tests and follow the difficult test instructions, checks all known bugs to confirm that their bugs are not duplicated. They gave the extra time to test the website after reading the complicated instructions and submit the report then the point will also equal to the live sites testers and amount will also not the same. Even the live sites bugs' amount more than old sites.
The live website testers ranking will still at the top and the old test testers give the extra time but the ranking cannot be improved.
I think this issue should be improved.
Thank you
Closed